England went into the World Cup as perennial underachievers and left a month later having equaled our best performance in nearly 30 years and with pride in the national team rightfully restored. Just how the hell did that happen?
First, some context. If we're being brutally honest, England have been middling for literally decades. After beating Germany 4-2 in the World Cup final at our home tournament in 1966, the closest we came in subsequent years was a semi-final in Italia 90, which we inevitably lost to the Germans.
Not that we hold a grudge against our Teutonic cousins or anything |
Oh, bore off already |
Things were to get more embarrassing for England. After the humiliation against Iceland, the English FA decided to get realistic. England were crap, and indeed had been crap for decades. Why couldn't we spin this to our advantage? Other teams with far less quality than us were able to progress through tournaments by playing dour football, defending well, and sticking in the boot against more gifted opposition. A giant lightbulb went on above the FA headquarters: "That could be us!". The solution was to hire Sam Allardyce, a manager with a proven track record of keeping terrible teams in the Premier League.
This would not be easy to stomach. England fans had long had delusions of grandeur (1966! Bobby Moore! Three Lions!), and Big Sam promised a style of football that was not so much 'tiki-taka' as it was 'agricultural'. And we're talking Soviet-turnip-collective levels of agriculture here: 4-4-2, long balls from the back, knockdowns by a tall number 10 to a nippy number 9. To give you an idea of how enjoyable this is to watch, one Everton fan forum noted that Allardyce's nicknames while managing their club ranged from "curry udders", "chippy tits", to my personal favourite, "The Count of Monte Bisto".
The FA knew all of this going in. It might not be pretty, but it was a Faustian pact worth making so long as we wouldn't be humiliated every two years by nations that half our squad would struggle to locate on a map. Unfortunately, in the event Allardyce lasted precisely one game before being forced to resign after being caught up in a newspaper sting. Morale was at rock bottom.
Harry Kane's hat-trick was completed by a fortunate deflection off his heel, which really is the kind of goal that you only score when things are already going your way. In so doing, Kane became only the third English player to score a hat-trick at a World Cup.
Game 3: England 0-1 Belgium
The final game of the group stage saw England in the unfamiliar position of having already qualified. Normally, we'd desperately be chasing an unlikely win against previously underestimated opposition, whilst the TV coverage would feature boffins in the studio running computer simulations to explain what specific combination of results elsewhere we would need to go through. Not so this time; no drama, no fuss. It was all very Southgate: professional, organised, confident.
With Belgium also winning two out of two, the final group stage game placed both teams in a difficult position. The winning team would theoretically have an easier game next, but would paradoxically face a much tougher route to the final. The loser would have to overcome the Group H winners, but would face a much easier stroll as the knockouts progressed.
With both teams through and little motivation to go all out for the win, it wasn't surprising to see both sides make wholesale changes. Who would seize the opportunity to impress?
Unfortunately, it was Adnan bloody Januzaj. Having burst onto the scene at United a few years ago, his career seemed to be fizzling out after unsuccessful loans to Borussia Dortmund and *cough* Sunderland. I was honestly surprised to see his name on the Belgian team sheet, and even more surprised when he curled in an admittedly brilliant goal to seal what had otherwise been a rather dull affair. Aside from a Marcus Rashford one-on-one that he somehow failed to convert, there was very little to write home about. It probably says a lot that the undisputed highlight of the game was when Batshuayi tried to celebrate the goal by lashing the ball into the back of the net, only to accidentally hit the post and see it ricochet back into his face.
To be fair, he took it pretty well after the game:
In any case, it didn't really matter all that much. England had already improved on their 2014 performance and successfully navigated their way out of the group stage, where they would face off against the Cocaine Kings* themselves: Colombia.
(*not an officially sanctioned nickname)
See you again soon for a full round-up of England's jaunt through the knockouts!
To be fair, he's also always good value for the lols |
The FA knew all of this going in. It might not be pretty, but it was a Faustian pact worth making so long as we wouldn't be humiliated every two years by nations that half our squad would struggle to locate on a map. Unfortunately, in the event Allardyce lasted precisely one game before being forced to resign after being caught up in a newspaper sting. Morale was at rock bottom.
In the absence of a cohesive plan, the FA decided to temporarily give the poisoned chalice position to the under-21 manager, who had turned down the job earlier in the summer and took pains to tell anyone who'd listen that he didn't really want to be England manager. Yep, Gareth Southgate took some persuading.
With qualification for Russia 2018 soon assured, Southgate's next hurdle was picking his squad. Inevitably, the English media love to have a field day with the squad selection. After all, somebody has to be left out of a 23 man squad, and after England are predictably sent home early it's easy to say "we would've gone through if only we'd taken [insert any one of fifty less-fancied players here]". For Southgate, his task was relatively straightforward. Wayne Rooney had recently broken the England scoring record, but had hardly set the Premier League alight after his move from Man United back to Everton. In the end, it was an easy choice to leave out Rooney, who instead spent his summer moving across the pond to DC United. Similarly, Joe Hart had been England keeper for a number of years, despite a growing body of evidence that he wasn't actually very good. Pep Guardiola had shipped him out of Man City after being there for all of five minutes, and a lackluster Serie A loan was followed by a middling spell at West Ham punctuated by a number of blunders. Not that he was bitter about it, or anything.
England would be sure to miss his calm, measured presence at the back |
After dropping a few of these older players who no longer deserved a spot, the England squad was looking pretty decent. It was the third youngest in the tournament, and- on paper at least- things looked well-balanced, bold, and optimistic. After some solid wins in the warm-up games (including a banger of a goal from Marcus Rashford), the squad were ready to head off to Russia.
Although if you're trying to temper expectations, this is the last thing you bloody need. |
Game 1: England 2 -1 Tunisia
Going into the tournament, this looked like one of the worst possible opening matches. Face a genuinely brilliant team, and it's easy to take a defeat on the chin and say "they were just better than us". Face a World Cup minnow, and you should roundly batter them. Tunisia falls into the sticky middle category by being a team that's still a relatively tricky proposition, but who you should nevertheless beat. Failure to do so is a real blow to morale. In 2010, England's monumentally woeful 0-0 draw against Algeria was later described as "England's footballing nadir"(admittedly, this was before the Iceland game), and the turgid display knocked our confidence to such an extent that we were pretty much dead in the water from that point on. England would need a good performance against Tunisia in 2018 to avoid the same fate.
England started brightly, and when Harry Kane scored inside 11 minutes, it was an encouraging sign. Long-suffering England fans had been here before though; Steven Gerard scored against the USA in the first four minutes of our 2010 campaign, and we all remember how that ended.
"FFS" - every single England fan groaning in unison, 2010 |
It was in this game we got our first glimpse at what would go on to be a recurring theme of the World Cup: shithousery. This almost inexplicable low-level cheating was a plague in the early stages of the tournament, before teams began to realise that VAR meant such transgressions would- shockingly- be punished. Kyle Walker might have been guilty of some basic shithousery when he gifted Tunisia a penalty by inexplicably swinging his arm in the box, but England were certainly more sinned against than sinning. England's first goals had shown we were dangerous at set pieces, and Tunisia did their utmost to make sure that England- and Harry Kane in particular- were not to get on the end of corners.
The homoerotic tension was palpable. |
It looked like England were running on World Cup autopilot; going ahead early before gifting the opposition an undeserved equaliser and losing any desire to impact the game. We looked as though we were sleepwalking to a stalemate, and it was all so crushingly predictable. That was, at least, until we got one more corner in the 91st minute...
F*&!#@ GET IN YOU BEAUTY |
Not for the first time at Russia 2018, this sent England fans through the roof- though admittedly, some let it go to their heads more than others.
Someone always has to go overboard, don't they? |
In the most un-England like of fashions, we'd had snatched all 3 points at the death. With a winnable game against Panama coming next, things were looking pretty rosy. Maybe it was time to dare to dream?
By the always excellent David Squires |
Game 2: England 6-1 Panama
To be fair, Panama weren't expected to do much. This was their debut tournament, and in many ways it was a great achievement for a nation of their size and footballing pedigree to even get to the tournament. Again, this in itself offers a potential banana skin to competitors: anything other than a comprehensive win would simply not be good enough. How would England respond to this mental pressure?
It's a point so banal that it barely needs saying, but the early goal was important. Against opposition of Panama's level, you're expected to chalk up at least a few goals. The longer the game stays at 0-0, the more frustrated the bigger team becomes and the more the underdogs begin to realise that they might actually be able to nick something from the game. Fortunately for us, John Stones rose to power in a header within the first ten minutes and England never looked back.
Not that we didn't have to overcome difficulties for the victory. During that first goal, Maguire was essentially being grappled to the floor, and it was a tactic that would be repeated often throughout the game. Panama's defence had apparently decided before the match started that their best tactic against England would be to turn the shithousery up to 11 and just hope that they'd get away with it.
Which was rather optimistic when holds such as this are rarely seen outside the world of Olympic wrestling |
Morally, it was undeniably satisfying to see Panama's shithousery being punished again and again by the ref, and Kane dutifully notched up two textbook penalties. A masterclass in set-piece strategy was finished off again by Stones (which hilariously put him ahead of Rooney for the number of goals scored at a World Cup), and Jesse Lingard piled in too by scoring a contender for goal of the tournament. A neat one-two followed by a curling, dipping effort into the top right corner, it was one to savour.
You can practically hear it being burned to the highlights DVD as you're watching it |
Again, Panama were not the toughest opposition you could face at a World Cup. But England going in at half-time in a major tournament being 5-0 up? England had literally never had it so good.
Again, some fans let the performance go to their heads |
Game 3: England 0-1 Belgium
The final game of the group stage saw England in the unfamiliar position of having already qualified. Normally, we'd desperately be chasing an unlikely win against previously underestimated opposition, whilst the TV coverage would feature boffins in the studio running computer simulations to explain what specific combination of results elsewhere we would need to go through. Not so this time; no drama, no fuss. It was all very Southgate: professional, organised, confident.
With Belgium also winning two out of two, the final group stage game placed both teams in a difficult position. The winning team would theoretically have an easier game next, but would paradoxically face a much tougher route to the final. The loser would have to overcome the Group H winners, but would face a much easier stroll as the knockouts progressed.
With both teams through and little motivation to go all out for the win, it wasn't surprising to see both sides make wholesale changes. Who would seize the opportunity to impress?
Unfortunately, it was Adnan bloody Januzaj. Having burst onto the scene at United a few years ago, his career seemed to be fizzling out after unsuccessful loans to Borussia Dortmund and *cough* Sunderland. I was honestly surprised to see his name on the Belgian team sheet, and even more surprised when he curled in an admittedly brilliant goal to seal what had otherwise been a rather dull affair. Aside from a Marcus Rashford one-on-one that he somehow failed to convert, there was very little to write home about. It probably says a lot that the undisputed highlight of the game was when Batshuayi tried to celebrate the goal by lashing the ball into the back of the net, only to accidentally hit the post and see it ricochet back into his face.
THWACK |
In any case, it didn't really matter all that much. England had already improved on their 2014 performance and successfully navigated their way out of the group stage, where they would face off against the Cocaine Kings* themselves: Colombia.
(*not an officially sanctioned nickname)
See you again soon for a full round-up of England's jaunt through the knockouts!